{"id":238,"date":"1986-01-01T23:00:41","date_gmt":"1986-01-01T23:00:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/michael-welker.com\/?p=238"},"modified":"1986-01-01T23:00:41","modified_gmt":"1986-01-01T23:00:41","slug":"39-dogmatische-theologie-und-postmoderne-metaphysik-karl-barths-theologie-prozesstheologie-und-die-religionstheorie-whiteheads","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/michael-welker.com\/en\/39-dogmatische-theologie-und-postmoderne-metaphysik-karl-barths-theologie-prozesstheologie-und-die-religionstheorie-whiteheads\/","title":{"rendered":"39. \u201eDogmatische Theologie und postmoderne Metaphysik. Karl Barths Theologie, Proze\u00dftheologie und die Religionstheorie Whiteheads\u201c"},"content":{"rendered":"

a.<\/strong> \u201eDogmatische Theologie und postmoderne Metaphysik. Karl Barths Theologie, Proze\u00dftheologie und die Religionstheorie Whiteheads\u201c, in: Neue Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Systematische Theologie<\/em> 28 (1986), 311-326.<\/p>\n<\/div>

Vor allem in den USA gab und gibt es immer wieder die Anfragen, wie so verschiedene Konzeptionen von Theologie wie die Barths und die der Prozesstheologie, die an Whiteheads Werk anschlie\u00dft, in ein Verh\u00e4ltnis zu setzen seien. Zun\u00e4chst scheint guter Rat teuer. Karl Barth hat Texte Whiteheads nie gelesen. Auch auf Prozesstheologen und -theologinnen hat Barth weder kritisch noch zustimmend Bezug genommen. Nur Schubert Ogden wird einmal kurz erw\u00e4hnt. Doch er wird als Bultmannianer angesehen und, wie Barth sich auszudr\u00fccken beliebte, der \u201eRotte Korah\u201c (Num 16) zugerechnet.<\/p>\n<\/div>

<\/i><\/span>Volltext (PDF)<\/span><\/a><\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>

 <\/p>\n

b.<\/strong>\u00a0\u201eKarl Barth\u2019s Theology and Process Theology\u201c, in: Theology Today<\/em> 43 (1986), 383-397.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>
<\/i><\/span>Volltext (pdf)<\/span><\/a><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[160,224],"tags":[172,244,247,204,248],"class_list":["post-238","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-aufsaetze","category-essays","tag-barth","tag-barth-en","tag-moderne-und-postmoderne-en","tag-prozessphilosophie-prozesstheologie-whitehead","tag-prozessphilosophie-prozesstheologie-whitehead-en"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/michael-welker.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/michael-welker.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/michael-welker.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michael-welker.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michael-welker.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=238"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/michael-welker.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/michael-welker.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=238"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michael-welker.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=238"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michael-welker.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=238"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}