{"id":963,"date":"2008-01-01T16:01:06","date_gmt":"2008-01-01T16:01:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/michael-welker.com\/?p=963"},"modified":"2008-01-01T16:01:06","modified_gmt":"2008-01-01T16:01:06","slug":"301-habermas-und-ratzinger-zur-zukunft-der-religion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/michael-welker.com\/en\/301-habermas-und-ratzinger-zur-zukunft-der-religion\/","title":{"rendered":"301. \u201eHabermas und Ratzinger zur Zukunft der Religion\u201c"},"content":{"rendered":"

a. \u201eHabermas und Ratzinger zur Zukunft der Religion\u201c, in: Evangelische Theologie<\/em> 68 (2008), 310-324.<\/p>\n

\n<\/div>

Sobald man eine oberfl\u00e4chliche Betrachtungsebene verl\u00e4sst, muss man sich fragen, ob die Positionen beider Denker sich tats\u00e4chlich in einen Dialog bringen lassen, mit einer gemeinsamen Progressrichtung, mit nachvollziehbaren, zumindest punktuellen \u00dcbereinstimmungen und klaren Dissensen.<\/p>\n<\/div>

<\/i><\/span>Volltext (PDF)<\/span><\/a><\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>

b.\u00a0\u201eHabermas und Ratzinger zur Zukunft der Religion\u201c, in: Benedikt Roth\u00f6hler u. Alexander Manisali (Hg.), Mythos & Ritual, FS Jan Assmann, <\/em>Lit: Berlin 2008, 277-295.<\/p>\n

\n<\/div>

<\/i><\/span>Volltext (PDF)<\/span><\/a><\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>

c.\u00a0\u201eHabermas and Ratzinger on the Future of Religion\u201c, in: Scottish Journal of Theology<\/em> 63\/4 (2010), 456-473.<\/p>\n

\n<\/div>

\n<\/div>

<\/i><\/span>Volltext (PDF)<\/span><\/a><\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>

d.\u00a0\u201eHabermas und Ratzinger zur Zukunft der Religion\u201c, \u00dcbersetzung ins Koreanische von Shin Jeon Ho, in: Multi-perspektivische und biblisch orientierte Erforschung heutiger theologischer Themen<\/em>, hg. Kim Jae Jin, Seoul: Dong-Yeon Press, 2015, 179-206.<\/p>\n<\/div>

<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[224],"tags":[236,243,228,272],"class_list":["post-963","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-essays","tag-criticism-of-religion-and-culture","tag-luhmann-system-theory","tag-more-philosophers","tag-public-and-political-theology-civil-and-interreligious-dialogue"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/michael-welker.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/963","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/michael-welker.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/michael-welker.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michael-welker.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michael-welker.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=963"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/michael-welker.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/963\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/michael-welker.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=963"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michael-welker.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=963"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michael-welker.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=963"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}